|
|||||||||||||||||||
Home -- Reauthorization of NCLB
|
|
| As the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, in its latest reiteration -- NCLB -- begins the reauthorization process -- these links will share with you, some of the latest calls for changes in the legislation: |
NEW! Everything
You Wanted to Know About NCLB: This site, geared for parents is a great summary of the law and where NCLB is at, at this point in time with the reauthorization. |
NEW! This is a letter regarding changes that Jonathan Kozol handed to Ted Kennedy about 1 week ago. This letter outlines his suggestions -- and he (Kozol) speaks on behalf of many organizations that are disillusioned with the current legislation. |
| The following
link is for a summary of the bipartisan "discussion draft" for
reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, reauthorized
in 2002 as No Child Left Behind. The draft, circulated to education organizations,
was released by House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller
and covers Title I, Part A of ESEA. http://edlabor.house.gov/bills/MillerMcKeonNCLBDiscussionDraftSummary.pdf |
NEW! SPICING UP
NCLB WITH EARLY EDUCATION INITIATIVES |
| The
Reauthorization of No Child Left Behind: Views from the Nation’s Best Teachers Over the last several weeks, countless researchers, policy observers, and other educational stakeholders have joined with policymakers to comment on the impending reauthorization of No Child Left Behind. However, there has been a missing voice. Policymakers have not had the
opportunity to hear from those who are most intimately impacted by NCLB,
the teachers who strive every day in classrooms across America to allow
every student to achieve. The Center for Teaching Quality and members
of the Teacher Leaders Network seek to remedy this critical oversight
with The Reauthorization of No
Child Left Behind: Views from the Nation's Best Teachers.
This report presents the insights of highly accomplished educators, both
in text and in their own voices through embedded podcasts, to describe
how this landmark education legislation has benefitted their students
-- and fallen short of its promise. |
![]() Beyond NCLB: Fulfilling the Promise to Our Nation's Children (download full report) The recommendations in "Beyond NCLB: Fulfilling the Promise to Our Nation's Children," were released by the Commission on No Child Left Behind, a group led by former Governor Roy E. Barnes of Georgia and Tommy Thompson, the former secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. The report is meant to be a blueprint for Congress as it prepares to consider renewal of the law later this year. |
7/6/2007 The Business Coalition for Student Achievement – representing business leaders from every sector of the economy – believes that improving the performance of the K-12 education system in the United States is necessary to provide a strong foundation for both U.S. competitiveness and for individuals to succeed in our rapidly changing world. |
| 6/19/2007 "To
Know NCLB Is to Like It, ETS Poll Finds" |
6/19/2007 "Civil Rights
Groups Press for NCLB to Focus on High Schools" |
Issue No. 3: Is Support for Standards and Testing Fading? Download this PDF Report from The Public Agenda |
|
BOSTON
GLOBE |
![]() The National Education Association's official statement and position on the reauthorization -- ESEA: It's Time for a Change! Download Full Report |
PTA
recommendations
for Parent Involvement for Upcoming Reauthorization |
| NCLB
LETTERS TO CONGRESS PROJECT Right now the United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions is working on language for the re-authorization of the No Child Left Behind Act. This is a good time to express your thoughts and concerns to your elected leaders. One way to do this is through the "No Child Left Behind Letters to Congress Project" on-line at FaithfulAmerica.org. There you will find 10 letters – 10 distinct opportunities for you to weigh in on the pending reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act. The letters will be sent electronically according to your zip code to your two senators and your Congressional representative. In each letter there is a place, right in the middle, for you to insert your own story. Please use these opportunities to share how NCLB is affecting your child, or a teacher you know, or your own school, or your community. Each of these letters lifts up one of "Ten Moral Concerns in the Implementation of No Child Left Behind," a statement released by the National Council of Churches last year. Please take this opportunity to tell your own truth to your elected officials. |
![]() The official site for Bush's NCLB recommendation: Building on Results-Reauthorization of NCLB (pdf) 2007 State of the Union discussing Reauthorization of NCLB |
|
|
![]() PEN STATEMENT ON NCLB COMMISSION FINDINGS Public Education Network (PEN) is pleased that the bi-partisan Commission on No Child Left Behind has recommended much-needed improvements to the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, many of which are consistent with research PEN has conducted concerning public views of NCLB. Read More... |
![]() The Council of Chief State School Officers has created a report called: Recommendations to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act |
![]() Recommendations for the Reauthorization of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The
Kansas State Board of Education believes that all students must be
prepared for the future with the appropriate 21st century skills. To accomplish
this and to meet the intent of ESEA, the Kansas State Board of Education
offers the following recommendations for the improvement of ESEA. |
| A
roundup of recent NCLB-related stories from Education Week http://www.edweek.org/ew/index.html |
|
"Govs
Call for More Control Over NCLB" |
|
Anne Henderson's testimony at the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions NCLB Reauthorization: Effective Strategies for Engaging Parents and Communities in Schools held 3/28/07. |
| WHY
NCLB NEEDS TO BE RESTRUCTURED TO ACCOMPLISH ITS GOALS AND HOW TO DO IT The foundations upon which the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law's accountability system is built are flawed, writes Gary Ratner in a new article in the University of the District of Columbia Law Review. Deep structural changes are needed to make the legislation effective. "Merely tweaking the accountability scheme and increasing funding would be like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic," said Ratner. Without changes from Congress, if school improvements continue at the current rates, it will take 280 more years for the act to meet its goals of bringing every student in the nation to proficiency in reading (as measured by the National Assessment of Educational Progress.) Ratner identifies four faulty assumptions that form the foundation of NCLB's Adequate Yearly Progress/sanctions-based accountability system, and that doom it to failure: (1) Punitive sanctions motivate real educational improvements; (2) Problems are local and individual schools have the capacity to addr! ess them in isolation; (3) Escalating, strategic-planning based, piecemeal sanctions produce necessary change; and (4) States have the capacity to turn around failing schools without significant new investments in human and financial resources. Instead of having the federal government continue to sanction schools for failing to raise test scores, it needs to lead states and localities to make the changes that experienced educators know, and research generally confirms, enhance student learning: systemic improvements in teacher and administrator preparation, training, curriculum level and family support. Then, the Government needs to hold localities and states accountable for implementing those changes, while continuing to require regular publication of test results for each student subgroup, so that the public can monitor achievement in each school. http://www.citizenseffectiveschools.org/udclawreview.pdf |